Prepare your Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Certification Exam
Getting ready for the Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 certification exam can feel challenging, but with the right preparation, success is closer than you think. At PASS4EXAMS, we provide authentic, verified, and updated study materials designed to help you pass confidently on your first attempt.
Why Choose PASS4EXAMS for Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10?
At PASS4EXAMS, we focus on real results. Our exam preparation materials are carefully developed to match the latest exam structure and objectives.
Real Exam-Based Questions – Practice with content that reflects the actual Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 exam pattern.
Updated Regularly – Stay current with the most recent NCP-MCI-6.10 syllabus and vendor updates.
Verified by Experts – Every question is reviewed by certified professionals for accuracy and quality.
Instant Access – Download your materials immediately after purchase and start preparing right away.
100% Pass Guarantee – If you prepare with PASS4EXAMS, your success is fully guaranteed.
What’s Inside the Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Study Material
When you choose PASS4EXAMS, you get a complete and reliable preparation experience:
Comprehensive Question & Answer Sets that cover all exam objectives.
Practice Tests that simulate the real exam environment.
Detailed Explanations to strengthen understanding of each concept.
Free 3 months Updates ensuring your material stays relevant.
Expert Preparation Tips to help you study efficiently and effectively.
Why Get Certified?
Earning your Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 certification demonstrates your professional competence, validates your technical skills, and enhances your career opportunities. It’s a globally recognized credential that helps you stand out in the competitive IT industry.
Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Sample Question Answers
Question # 1
An administrator is managing a 4-node cluster with different hardware generations:Two G5 Nodes → 2 CPUs (12 cores), 1 SSD (1.92 TB), 2 HDDs (4 TB).
Two G7 Nodes → 2 CPUs (16 cores), 2 SSDs (1.92 TB), 4 HDDs (4 TB).
The cluster will be decommissioned from production and used for Disaster Recovery (DR) purposes
with an RPO of 1 hour.
What is the best approach when replacing G5 nodes without impacting performance?
New node must have at least 2 SSDs. New node must be G7 or G8. New node must have 2 CPUs with 12 cores. New node must be hybrid.
Answer: A Explanation: For optimal Disaster Recovery performance, new nodes must match or exceed the storage
performance of existing nodes.
Option A (New node must have at least 2 SSDs) is correct: Since the G7 nodes have two SSDs, replacing G5 nodes with at least 2 SSDs ensures consistent SSD
cache and performance.
Option B is incorrect:
G7 or G8 nodes may help, but storage performance is more critical for DR.
Option C is incorrect:
CPU core count does not impact DR storage performance as much as SSD capacity.
Option D is incorrect:
Hybrid nodes are already in use, but SSDs must match for performance balance.
Reference:
Nutanix Hardware Guide → Choosing Nodes for Hybrid and DR Clusters
Nutanix KB → Balancing Storage Across Different Hardware Generations
Question # 2
How can a VM or Volume Group (VG) be associated with a Storage Policy?
Assign the Storage Policy directly on the VM or VG. Assign the VM or VG directly to the Storage Policy. Migrate the VM or VG to the Storage Container assigned to the Storage Policy. Assign the VM or VG to the same Category as the Storage Policy.
Answer: D Explanation: Storage Policies in Nutanix are applied through Categories, allowing policy-based automation and
enforcement. Option D (Assign the VM or VG to the same Category as the Storage Policy) is correct:
Nutanix applies Storage Policies based on VM Categories, enabling flexibility in policy enforcement.
Option A is incorrect:
Storage Policies are not directly assigned at the VM or VG level”they apply through Categories.
Option B is incorrect:
Policies must be assigned to Categories, not directly to individual VMs/VGs.
Option C is incorrect:
Migrating to a storage container does not automatically apply a Storage Policy.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Management Guide → Using Categories for Policy-Based Storage Management
Nutanix KB → Best Practices for Applying Storage Policies to VMs
Question # 3
An administrator wants to clean up inactive VMs using VM Efficiency in Nutanix. The business requires that VMs must be inactive for 120 days before deletion.A Playbook was created to delete Dead and Zombie VMs with a 99-day wait period after they are
marked inactive.
How long will have passed before these VMs are deleted? (Choose two.)
For Dead VMs, the wait before deletion is 120 days. For Zombie VMs, the wait before deletion is 129 days. For Dead VMs, the wait before deletion is 129 days. For Zombie VMs, the wait before deletion is 120 days.
Answer: B, C Explanation: Dead VMs and Zombie VMs are different classifications of inactive VMs in Nutanix, and their deletion
timelines depend on Playbook configuration.
Dead VMs → Considered inactive after 30 days, then must wait 99 more days before deletion.
Total time: 30 + 99 = 129 days.
(Option C is correct).
Zombie VMs → Considered inactive after 30 days, then must wait 99 more days before deletion.
Total time: 30 + 99 = 129 days.
(Option B is correct).
Reference:
Nutanix Prism Central Guide → Using VM Efficiency to Manage Inactive VMs
Nutanix KB → Configuring Playbooks for Automatic VM Cleanup
Question # 4
An administrator observes an alert in Prism for a hybrid SSD/HDD cluster: "Storage Pool SSD utilization consistently above 75%."What is the potential impact of this condition?
The cluster is unable to sustain an SSD disk failure. The cluster may be nearly out of storage for metadata. The cluster is at risk of entering a read-only state. Average I/O latency in the cluster may increase.
Answer: D Explanation: High SSD utilization in a hybrid cluster can lead to increased I/O latency as new writes may spill over
to HDDs, reducing overall performance.
Option D (Average I/O latency in the cluster may increase) is correct:
If SSD usage is above 75%, data tiering shifts to slower HDDs, increasing latency.
Option A is incorrect:
SSD failures are managed via redundancy policies (RF2/RF3), and high utilization does not impact
failure handling.
Option B is incorrect:
Metadata is stored separately, and high SSD usage does not mean metadata is at risk. Option C is incorrect:
Clusters do not go into read-only mode due to high SSD utilization”they simply experience
performance degradation.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Performance Guide → SSD Tiering and Performance Management
Nutanix KB → Managing High SSD Utilization in Hybrid Clusters
Question # 5
Which two actions occur by default on a node that is placed in Maintenance Mode? (Choose two.)
Non-migratable VMs are powered off and restarted on other hosts in the cluster. All eligible VMs on the host are migrated to other hosts in the cluster. All eligible VMs on the host are powered off.
Answer: B, D Explanation: When a node is placed into Maintenance Mode, Nutanix follows a structured process to ensure
service continuity and data integrity. Option B (All eligible VMs on the host are migrated to other hosts) is correct: Live Migration automatically moves VMs to other hosts to avoid downtime.
This ensures workloads remain operational during maintenance.
Option D (Non-migratable VMs are powered off) is correct:
Some VMs, such as those using GPU pass-through or local storage dependencies, cannot be livemigrated.
These VMs must be powered off before placing the host into Maintenance Mode.
Option A is incorrect:
Non-migratable VMs are not automatically restarted on other hosts”they remain powered off until
manually restarted.
Option C is incorrect:
Eligible VMs are live-migrated, not powered off.
Reference:
Nutanix AHV Best Practices → Understanding Maintenance Mode Behavior
Nutanix KB → VM Migration and Power-Off Scenarios in Maintenance Mode
Question # 6
An administrator receives an alert in Prism stating: "Storage container on cluster will run out of storage resources inapproximately 1 day." However, the cluster has plenty of available space remaining.
What configuration setting is causing the container to run out of space while the cluster has space
remaining?
Advertised Capacity is set too low. Reserved Capacity is set too high. Compression is set too low. Replication Factor is set too high.
Answer: B Explanation: Reserved Capacity settings define how much storage is exclusively allocated for a specific container.
Option B (Reserved Capacity is too high) is correct:
If too much space is reserved for a container, it can report "out of space" while the cluster still has
free capacity.
Options A, C, and D are incorrect:
Advertised Capacity, Compression, and RF settings do not directly cause storage exhaustion unless
misconfigured with Reserved Capacity.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Best Practices → Configuring Reserved and Advertised Capacity
Nutanix KB → Troubleshooting Storage Container Out-of-Space Alerts
Question # 7
An administrator is configuring Nutanix Disaster Recovery (DR) for a cross-hypervisor setup (ESXi to AHV) but finds that guest VMs do not recover properly at the DR location.What is required for a successful cross-hypervisor DR event?
Utilize delta disks. Deploy Legacy BIOS boot on hosts within the cluster. Use raw device mappings. Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) must be installed on source guest VMs.
Answer: D Explanation: For cross-hypervisor DR failover (e.g., ESXi to AHV), Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) must be installed on
VMs to ensure proper configuration and recovery.
Option D (NGT must be installed on source guest VMs) is correct:
NGT ensures correct reconfiguration of VM devices and networking settings during failover.
It handles disk and driver reassignments between ESXi and AHV.
Option A (Utilize delta disks) is incorrect:
Delta disks are used in snapshot optimization, not DR failover.
Option B (Deploy Legacy BIOS boot) is incorrect:
AHV prefers UEFI boot mode, and Legacy BIOS is not a requirement.
Option C (Use raw device mappings) is incorrect:
RDMs are VMware-specific and are not used in AHV failover scenarios.
Reference:
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Cross-Hypervisor Failover Best Practices
Nutanix KB → Ensuring VM Compatibility During ESXi to AHV DR
Question # 8
An administrator needs to create a single chart showing multiple storage bandwidth metrics a VM is
consuming.Which type of chart should the administrator create?
Metric Chart Entity Chart Hypervisor Performance Chart VM Summary Chart
Answer: B Explanation: Entity Charts in Nutanix Prism Central allow multiple metrics from a single entity (e.g., VM, storage
container) to be displayed on a single graph.
Option B (Entity Chart) is correct:
This allows the administrator to track multiple performance metrics (e.g., read/write bandwidth, IOPS) for a specific VM.
Option A (Metric Chart) is incorrect:
Metric Charts track a single metric across multiple entities, which does not meet the requirement of
displaying multiple metrics for a single VM.
Option C (Hypervisor Performance Chart) is incorrect:
Hypervisor Performance Charts track host-level metrics, not VM-specific bandwidth metrics.
Option D (VM Summary Chart) is incorrect:
VM Summary Charts only provide an overview and do not support custom multi-metric tracking.
Reference:
Nutanix Prism Central Guide → Entity vs. Metric Charts for Performance Analysis
Nutanix KB → Creating Custom Charts in Prism Central
Question # 9
An administrator needs to enable Windows Defender Credential Guard to comply with company
policy.The new VM configurations include:Legacy BIOS
4 vCPUs
8 GB RAM
Windows Server 2019
What must be changed in order to properly enable Windows Defender Credential Guard?
Update vCPU to 8. Enable UEFI with Secure Boot. Use Windows Server 2022. Update Memory to 16GB.
Answer: B Explanation: Windows Defender Credential Guard requires UEFI firmware and Secure Boot to function properly.
Option B (Enable UEFI with Secure Boot) is correct:
Credential Guard requires a UEFI-based boot mode rather than Legacy BIOS.
Secure Boot ensures only trusted OS components load, reducing attack surface for credential theft.
Option A (Update vCPU to 8) is incorrect:
Increasing vCPUs does not impact Credential Guard compatibility.
Option C (Use Windows Server 2022) is incorrect:
Windows Server 2019 supports Credential Guard; upgrading to 2022 is not required.
Option D (Update Memory to 16GB) is incorrect:
Credential Guard has no minimum RAM requirement beyond general OS needs.
Reference:
Microsoft Docs → Requirements for Windows Defender Credential Guard
Nutanix AHV VM Management Guide → Enabling Secure Boot & UEFI for Windows VMs
Question # 10
An administrator is protecting an application and its data stored on Volume Groups using Protection
Domains.During failover tests, all application VMs restore successfully, but the application data is completely
missing.How can the Protection Domain configuration be adjusted to avoid this issue in the future? (Choose
two.)
Select the "Auto protect related entities" checkbox. Manually add Volume Groups to Protected Entities. Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain. Use application-consistent snapshots.
Answer: A, B Explanation: Protection Domains (PDs) in Nutanix ensure that entire applications and their associated data are
protected during failover. However, Volume Groups (VGs) are not automatically included unless
explicitly configured.
Option A (Select "Auto protect related entities") is correct:
This setting ensures that associated Volume Groups, networks, and other dependencies are included
in the Protection Domain automatically.
Without enabling this, only the VM itself would be protected, leading to missing application data
upon failover.
Option B (Manually add Volume Groups to Protected Entities) is correct:
If "Auto protect related entities" is not enabled, the administrator must manually add Volume
Groups to the Protection Domain.
This ensures that both VMs and their attached Volume Groups are replicated and recovered together.
Option C (Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain) is incorrect:
Separating Volume Groups into a different PD does not guarantee they failover together with VMs.
It is best practice to keep related VMs and Volume Groups in the same PD.
Option D (Use application-consistent snapshots) is incorrect:
While application-consistent snapshots improve data integrity, they do not fix missing Volume
Groups in failover scenarios.
Reference:
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Protection Domain Configuration and Volume Groups
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Protection Domain Configuration and Volume Groups